Global assembling of Academicians, Researchers, Scholars & Industry to disseminate and exchange information at 100+ Allied Academics Conferences

Jin Gu
Peking University Cancer Hospital, China

Professor Gu Jin is an eminent surgeon and is currently Professor of colorectal Surgery Department of Beijing Cancer Hospital, Peking University Cancer Hospital. He is also Chairman of the Chinese Society of Oncology (Chinese Medical Association). He graduated with a medical degree from Beijing Medical University, after which he went on to complete further training as a Visiting Scholar at Les Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, France and then at the Columbia School of Physicians and Surgeons, US. Prior to assuming his present appointment, he held the position of Attending Physician before being promoted to Professor and Deputy Director of the Department of Surgery, Beijing Medical University, China. He has published more than 71 papers in reputed journals.


A surgeon makes a decision primarily based on whether a patient has indications or contraindications for surgery, which at the core, questions whether the patient benefits from surgery [1]. However, a surgeon often encounters a number of non-biomedical factors that affect the decision-making. The following case involves the dignity of a patient and the dilemma that a surgeon faces when the dignity contradicts surgical principles, as well as clinical guidelines and norms. The patient was a 32-year-old male. Two years ago, he had abdominal perineal resection (APR) and sigmoid colostomy for rectal cancer in another hospital, as well as physician recommended adjuvant chemotherapy. One year after surgery, a prominent lesion appeared at the stoma. When he came to our hospital in April 2016, the tumor had already invaded most of the lower abdomen wall, which had an ulcerated and infected surface, and the colostomy bag could not be fitted properly. It was suspected that the patient had metastatic lesions in the lungs as well, but this could not be confirmed. The patient was otherwise in good physical condition and strongly requested surgery. The patient explained that the lesion had prevented him from contact with people, even his family, which made him feel that he had no dignity, and this caused him immense pain (Figure 1). However, based on principles of oncological surgery, extensive local resection is not beneficial to the patient if there are suspicions of distant metastases. It was the patient’s last words that helped me make my decision: “I can’t even hug my daughter. What’s the point of living? Doctor, only you can restore my dignity!” I had repeated communication with the patient and his family, clearly explaining to them the indications, complications, and risks of the surgery. There were also differing opinions in the discussions within our department. In the end, I decided to proceed with the surgery for the sake of his dignity. The surgery was a success, and the patient recovered well (Figure 1). The patient returned home two weeks after surgery. He hugged his 4-year-old daughter, who had until then, refused to be affectionate with him. However, liver metastases appeared 4 months after the surgery and he received further treatment. This was the first time in the 30 years since I became a surgeon that I performed surgery for the dignity of the patient, even if it meant going against the current clinical guidelines. Cancers at stoma sites are rare, and only 20 cases have been reported in the literature to date. Even among these 20 reports, most are only case reports [2] [3]. Primarily from the perspective of surgical technology, there is no problem with tumor resection in this case. It is also possible to complete reconstructive surgery. Our surgery would have a huge physical impact on the patient, not to mention the suspected distant metastases. Given these reasons, should this surgery be performed. This is a new issue that surgeons may encounter: It is incontrovertible for a surgeon to base the decision of surgery on the surgical principles and clinical guidelines. However, what should the surgeon do when faced with non-biomedical factors, involving medical ethics, patient’s dignity, and social factors? Firstly, from an ethical and humanistic perspective, the patient in this case felt, through his relationship with his family and especially his daughter, that the disease debased his dignity as a human being. In particular, it was difficult for him to fulfill his role as a father, because he was unable to express his love for his daughter. A hug from a daughter was a very precious thing for this father at the current stage in his life. Especially in a country such as China with ancient roots, family values are very different from that of the West. The feelings Chinese parents have towards their children, especially regarding the care of the only child, are singularly inimitable. Therefore, the surgeon, in the role as a caretaker, should help the patient regain his dignity. It is in line with human rationale and sentiment for a surgeon to consider the patient’s main needs, in combination with his quality of life and clinical condition, as well as having an extensive discussion with the patient and the family, then coming to the conclusion of “surgery for the sake of the patient’s dignity,” in order to help him regain courage and confidence in life. Secondly, for a surgeon, the decision to perform surgery for the sake of the patient’s dignity is not included in the usual surgical principles. Strictly speaking, for patients with colon cancer, who are suspected of having distant metastases, oncologists may also question extensive resection of locally recurrent tumors and extensive reconstruction. Currently, there are no clinical guidelines or related regulations to recommend surgery with the patient’s dignity as consideration. Moreover, the definition of “dignity” is, in fact, relatively difficult to define. Third, a surgery for the sake of patient dignity will be questioned by the healthcare system. In China’s healthcare system, any surgery outside the scope of healthcare regulation is considered as an “off-label” surgery, and there is a risk of payment denial by the healthcare system. Therefore, surgeons should decide with caution to perform such controversial surgery for the sake of patient dignity, which is outside current regulations in the healthcare system. Before deciding to perform an “off-label” surgery for the sake of patient dignity, the surgeon should first consider the patient’s subjective needs and should have thorough communication with the patient and the family, as well as perform a multidisciplinary comprehensive assessment and have an effective communication with the health insurance agencies preoperatively. Given the current social context of China, a developing country where the healthcare system is far from perfect, it is necessary and more appropriate for the patients, the family, the attending surgeon, and health insurance agencies to negotiate for a good solution. A surgical decision-making mechanism incorporating multiple social factors such as patient dignity still has a long way to go. Classic surgical decision-making literatures and textbooks all have inarguably and clearly described the procedures, steps, basis, and even evidences for surgical decision- making [4] [5]. However, if we take a closer look, we will find that those decision-making processes seldom consider non-biomedical humanity factors such as sociology, ethics, or dignity. Humanistic qualities of surgeons directly affect psychological feelings of treated patients and even the therapeutic effects [6]. Enhancing the education and cultivation of surgeons for humanistic qualities is also an important part in our surgical decision-making. In addition to rigorously following clinical norms and guidelines in surgical decision-making, a surgeon should also consider many other patient factors, including their social psychology, dignity, ethnics, religions, and laws. Putting all of these together truly reflect the people-oriented character of modern medicine and the connotation of saving people’s lives. 1. Sacks GD, Dawes AJ, Ettner SL, et al. Surgeon perception of risk and benefit in the decision to operate. Ann Surg 2016; 264(6): 896-903. 2. Maeda C, Hidaka E, Shimada M, et al. Transverse colon cancer occurring at a colostomy site 35 years after colostomy: a case report. World Journal of Surgical Oncology 2015; 13(6):171. 3. Shibuya T, Uchiyama K, Kokuma M, et al. Metachronous adenocarcinoma occurring at a colostomy site after abdominoperineal resection for rectal carcinoma. J Gastroenterol 2002; 37:387–390. 4. Clive RG, Quick JBR, Simon JF, et al. Problems, diagnosis and management 5th Edition 2013; 10-16. 5. Courtney M, Townsend Jr, Mark E. Sabiston textbook of surgery: the biological basis of modern surgical practice, 19th edition 2012: 211-239. 6. Welling RE, Boberg JT. Professionalism: lifelong commitment for surgeons. Arch Surg 2003; 138(3): 262- 264.

Allied Academies Global Conference Directory

Mail us at

Program Director
Help Desk
More details about

Terms and Conditions


Delegates are personally responsible for their belongings at the venue. The Organizers will not be held responsible for any stolen or missing items belonging to Delegates, Speakers or Attendees; due to any reason whatsoever.


Registration fees do not include insurance of any kind.


Please note that any (or) all transportation and parking is the responsibility of the registrant.


Press permission must be obtained from allied academies Conferences Organizing Committee prior to the event. The press will not quote speakers or delegates unless they have obtained their approval in writing. The allied academies  is an objective third-party nonprofit organization. This conference is not associated with any commercial meeting company.

Requesting an Invitation Letter

For security purposes, letter of invitation will be sent only to those individuals who had registered for the conference. Once your registration is complete, please contact to request a personalized letter of invitation.

Regarding refunds, all bank charges will be for the registrants account.

Cancellation, Postponement and Transfer of Registration

Cancellation Policy

If an allied academy cancels this event for any reason, you will receive a credit for 100% of the registration fee paid. You may use this credit for another allied academies event which must occur within one year from the date of cancellation.


If allied academies   postpones an event for any reason and you are unable or unwilling to attend on rescheduled dates, you will receive a credit for 100% of the registration fee paid. You may use this credit for another e allied academies event which must occur within one year from the date of postponement.


Transfer of registration

All fully paid registrations are transferable to other persons from the same organization, if registered person is unable to attend the event. Transfers must be made by the registered person in writing to Details must be included the full name of replacement person, their title, contact phone number and email address. All other registration details will be assigned to the new person unless otherwise specified.

Registration can be transferred to one conference to another conference of Allied academies. if the person is unable to attend one of conferences.

However, Registration cannot be transferred if it is intimated within 14 days of respective conference.

The transferred registrations will not be eligible for Refund.

Visa Information

Keeping in view of increased security measures, we would like to request all the participants to apply for Visa as soon as possible.

Allied academies will not directly contact embassies and consulates on behalf of visa applicants. All delegates or invitees should apply for Business Visa only.

Important note for failed visa applications: Visa issues cannot come under the consideration of cancellation policy of Allied academies, including the inability to obtain a visa.

Refund Policy:

If the registrant is unable to attend, and is not in a position to transfer his/her participation to another person or event, then the following refund arrangements apply:

Keeping in view of advance payments towards Venue, Printing, Shipping, Hotels and other overheads, we had to keep Refund Policy is as following slabs-

·         Before 60 days of the conference: Eligible for Full Refund less $100 service Fee

·         Within 60-30 days of Conference: Eligible for 50% of payment Refund

·         Within 30 days of Conference: Not eligible for Refund

·         E-Poster Payments will not be refunded

Accommodation Cancellation Policy:

Accommodation Providers (Hotels) have their own cancellation policies, and they generally apply when cancellations are made less than 30 days prior to arrival. Please contact us as soon as possible, if you wish to cancel or amend your accommodation. Allied academies will advise the cancellation policy of your accommodation provider, prior to cancelling or amending your booking, to ensure you are fully aware of any non-refundable deposits.

Authorization Policy

Online Registration:

To register online please get authorization from your respective bank for Online International Transactions after that you can proceed for online transaction.

Offline Registration:

To register offline kindly mail us on with your participation interest as Speaker or Delegate and accommodation required (yes/no) with total nights, we will provide you the Invoice for wire transfer (bank to bank).

Soon after the Payment send us the bank receipt to confirm your registration offline.

On-Spot Registration:

You may register on-spot at the venue on the registration desk directly.

Note: On-spot we wont give any kind of discounts or packages. For Letter of Invitation you need to Register with $200 (Token amount) to confirm your participation remaining amount you have to pay on-spot.

Copyright © 2018-2019 Allied Academies, All Rights Reserved.